Text: Below is a student’s performance of the Bigfoot legend.

Interviewer: When did you first hear about Bigfoot?

Interviewee: Well, first I heard about Bigfoot probably in second or third grade because I had to do a group project for elementary school, and it was very intriguing to me at first because, you know, at that age. I was very fascinated by animals, especially large animals, you know, that’s why I chose Bigfoot. I could have chosen between Loch Ness monster and other conspiracies. But, so that’s when I first heard about Bigfoot.

Interviewer: Did you believe it? What did you think about it?

Interviewee: Well, honestly, I did believe in that moment, because I researched a bit and saw, you know, many people had seen it, but no one had ever photographed it, and because of that, I did believe it, but slowly as I grew up, I began not to believe it much, and viewed it as a tale. I mean, it’s like, there’s animals we haven’t seen, but something like that, with actual human characteristics, is difficult.

Context:

This interview arose from a conversation with another Forms of Folklore student, reflecting on childhood beliefs. I shared my memory and history of belief of the Bermuda Triangle, and after that, he recalled learning about Bigfoot. He first learned about Bigfoot in elementary school, when given a project to chose to study different legendary creatures.

Analysis:

This example showcases a unique mode of dissemination for folklore. The top-down institute, this interviewee’s school, facilitated children exploring and researching different “conspiracy theories”. This method is unusual as typically folkloric legends are pictured as not credible by official institutes, while certain folk groups hold the legends to hold some chance of credibility. My belief is that the assignment to explore different conspiracies was created expressly because conspiracy theories are typically not discussed in classrooms, and thus the students are more excited about learning about them than more official topics. The interviewee also said something interesting, in how he views Bigfoot to be less plausible, because, compared to other folk creatures, Bigfoot is more human. This assertion illustrates how people view humanity to be more unique, compared to other animals in the animal kingdom.