Tag Archives: ghost stories

Khmer Rouge Ghost Story

Date of Performance: 04/03/2025

Nationality: Filipino

Primary Language: English

Residence: Brisbane, Australia

My informant tells me of the supernatural experience of his father, who, according to their family, has always had “a third eye”. While my informant is somewhat skeptical, apparently his father would see and be able to communicate with spirits, and stories like this were commonplace in his family growing up. This particular one centers around a business trip to Cambodia, during which his father returned to his hotel after a meeting only to be unable to sleep – he was disturbed by a “large, uncomfortable presence from the top floor”. After a few failed attempts to go to bed, he decided to investigate, and went to the top floor, which was a bar and restaurant. When he got there, he was overwhelmed by the number of spirits he saw – all of which gave off an “extremely negative aura”. He could apparently tell based on this gut feeling that a horrific violent act had been committed on the floor, and asked the bartender if any such occurrence had taken place at the hotel. As he had expected, my informant’s father was told that during the Cambodian genocide, the Khmer Rouge had gathered up and executed a huge amount of dissenters in that very floor of that very building. Unsettled, he returned to his room and tried to sleep again, but was left awake all night. 

It’s clear my informant doesn’t fully buy into the story, but treats his dad’s third eye with a sort of reverence that makes even me inclined to believe it. His performance of the story was very compelling – it’s apparent that he has told this one a lot – and he seemed to relish in its telling. His father’s visions must have been a big part of his childhood, and so naturally, he holds their stories close to his heart.

As for me, I found this memorate really interesting, especially its link to a historical event/time period, an element of the story that gives it, to me, more credibility. From a more realistic point of view, I can imagine the functionality of his father’s “third eye” in my informant’s upbringing as a tool of discipline, serving as an authoritative way to impart moral and social lessons from a figure bigger than just his parents. My informant, like a lot of my others, grew up internationally., and so stories like these were likely a bigger part of his life, and met less resistance from his peers, than they would have here.

A Ghostly Encounter (Ghost Story)

Informant’s Story:
My informant shared a ghost story their dad has told since they were in kindergarten. “My dad was hired for a freelance construction job at a hotel, with compensation offered as an unlimited bar tab instead of cash. As he worked late into the night, a man who appeared to be part of the hotel staff served him drinks. Upon finishing the job, the worker thanked him, saying, ‘Thanks for helping my hotel.’ Later, when speaking with the hotel manager, my dad mentioned the drinks he’d received, only to learn that the hotel had no alcohol available that night. Confused, my dad pointed to a painting on the hotel wall, identifying the server. The manager, astonished, explained the painting depicted the hotel’s original owner, who had been deceased for over 40 years.”

Context:
This story was first introduced to my informant in kindergarten by their father, who regularly recounted it throughout their childhood. My informant vividly recalls the fascination and mystery surrounding this tale, noting the profound impact of hearing it from a trusted source like their father. This familial narrative holds special significance because it merges supernatural elements with personal and familial experience, creating a deep connection to the story that transcends mere entertainment.

Analysis:
At its core, this ghost story conveys powerful themes of reciprocity, karma, and moral responsibility. The informant strongly resonates with the lesson their father emphasized through the narrative: “If you take care of something, someone or something will take care of you.” The ghost’s gratitude and mysterious provision of drinks symbolizes the reciprocal nature of kindness, suggesting a deeper cosmic or moral balance at play. The informant interprets this as a powerful statement on karma: good intentions and actions inevitably result in positive outcomes.

Additionally, the informant highlighted a nuanced understanding of life’s interconnectivity, noting, “For every twenty dollars you find, someone has lost twenty dollars.” This insight demonstrates the story’s deeper exploration of life’s ethical and existential complexities. They also linked this lesson metaphorically to contemporary global issues such as climate change, further illustrating the story’s enduring relevance. Ultimately, the tale serves as a reflective medium, prompting listeners to consider deeper ethical responsibilities and interconnectedness in their everyday actions.

The Legend of Elias White (Ghost Story)

Informant’s Retelling:
“It all began in the dense, foggy woods of Bass Lake, a place so quiet you could hear your own heartbeat echoing through the trees. Legend has it that many years ago, a slave named Elias White escaped into these woods, never to return. Elias was a big man, known for his piercing white eyes that seemed to glow in the dark. Some said he had a gift for seeing things others couldn’t—things that weren’t meant to be seen.

One cold October night, Elias vanished. The slave owner searched for days. When they caught him, he was hung. A group of young campers watched from the brush. Elias, hanging from a tree branch, staring at the hikers, screeched in a strangled voice: ‘The forest keeps what it takes.’

The woods became a forbidden place after that. People whispered about strange lights flickering between the trees and an eerie voice that called out to anyone who dared enter. But the most terrifying part? Those who ventured too far into Bass Lake claimed they saw two glowing white eyes watching them from the shadows.

Fast forward to a summer night not too long ago. A group of teenagers, much like you guys, decided to test the legend. They laughed off the warnings, armed with flashlights and bravado, and headed into the forest. As they ventured deeper, the air grew colder, the trees seemed to close in, and a strange silence fell over the group.

Then, they heard it—a low, raspy whisper. At first, it sounded like the wind, but the words became clear: ‘The forest keeps what it takes.’

Panic set in, but when they turned to leave, they realized the path they came from had vanished. The forest had shifted, trapping them in its maze. One by one, their flashlights began to flicker and die. And then, they saw him.

Standing between the trees was a figure cloaked in shadows, his glowing white eyes piercing through the darkness. He didn’t move, but the teens could feel his presence, heavy and suffocating, as if the forest itself was breathing down their necks.

One of the teens, desperate to escape, shouted, ‘What do you want from us?!’

The figure tilted its head, and in a voice that sounded like leaves crunching underfoot, it replied: ‘To see what you’ve seen.’

The next morning, the search party found the teens huddled together at the forest’s edge, pale and trembling. They were alive, but something had changed. Their eyes—every single one of them—had turned a ghostly white, glowing faintly in the sunlight. To this day, they refuse to speak of what they saw, but they all agree on one thing: ‘Elias White is still out there, watching, waiting… and the forest keeps what it takes.'”

Context:
My information first encountered this chilling legend at a summer camp, narrated by an older counselor around a nighttime campfire. The setting enhanced the story’s eerie effect, amplifying its emotional impact and embedding it deeply in their memory. According to them, counselors would often use the tale of Elias White as both entertainment and a subtle warning to campers not to stray into restricted or dangerous areas of the forest. My informant recounted that the legend served as a rite of passage among campers, marking their initiation into the collective camp culture and identity.

Analysis:
The legend of Elias White embodies classic motifs found in ghost stories—escape, pursuit, punishment, and enduring hauntings—and taps into broader themes of historical injustice, lingering guilt, and retribution. Elias’s ghost symbolizes unresolved historical traumas and the oppressive past of slavery, turning a personal tragedy into a supernatural warning.

This narrative structure effectively uses fear to reinforce community boundaries, functioning as both a cautionary tale and a mechanism for social control within the camp environment. The transformation of the teenagers’ eyes symbolically conveys a loss of innocence or an irreversible awareness of darker truths.

Additionally, the phrase “the forest keeps what it takes” alludes to nature’s dominion over humanity, reflecting anxieties around human vulnerability and the unknowable mysteries lurking just beyond civilization’s edge. Thus, the legend of Elias White persists not only as entertainment but as a potent reminder of historical injustices and the enduring power of folklore to express cultural anxieties and collective memories.

Haunted house on the hill

Age: 20

Text: Ghost story of Richmond, England – haunted house on the hill

Context: “In my town in London, I live close to this really popular hill. On the hill, there’s a pub, and a lot of people go there at night, or they just walk up the hill during the day. There’s a huge, really nice, old house on the top of this hill. It’s beautiful, and definitely worth a lot of money, but it is completely abandoned. No one actually knows why, but people have made up a lot of stories about how it is haunted, because they think there must be some explanation for why no one lives there, and also why it’s never gone up for sale. When I was younger, my neighbor told me that it was haunted by a spirit. She said a pianist once lived there, named Isabelle. She moved into this huge house completely alone, and no one knew where she got the money to afford it, or why she needed such a big place for just herself. Anytime you walked near the house, you could hear her playing the piano. One night, the piano completely stopped, and no one heard from or saw Isabelle. Eventually, the police broke in and found the piano open, with a warm cup of tea sitting on it, but no sign of Isabelle. No one ever found her. Anyone who moved into the house after this, would hear the piano playing at the middle of the night. When they went downstairs to investigate it, it suddenly stopped. One tenant tried to move the piano out of the house, but tripped and fell, hit his head on the piano, and died. After this, no one dared to move into the house and it has remained empty ever since. After hearing this story, I told all my friends, and we used to dare each other to run up to the house and peek inside. One of my friends swore she saw a shadow sitting at the piano. This was only one of the variations I heard about this supposed haunted house, but to this day, no one has any idea why it has been abandoned.”

Analysis: This story about a haunted house functions as a legend. It is set in a real-world location and is framed around belief. The house exists, but the question of whether the ghost truly haunts it is open to interpretation. However, the purpose of this legend is less about whether or not the ghost exists but more about the negotiation of what to believe and the counter-legends that are produced from it.

The interviewee’s account of the story is an example of ostension, which is when people act out the contents of legends in real life. Her and her friends daring each other to run up to the house shows how the legend became social and performative. These performances do not make the story true, but they make the legend feel real. The narrative structure of this particular legend is also FOAF (friend of a friend). The interviewee heard this legend from her neighbor, which helps reinforce the truth. Additionally, her friend claiming that she saw the shadow also makes the legend more believable.

There is also a cultural function of this story. Whether or not the people in this town believe in the ghost, the legend functions to explain a question: why the beautiful, expensive house remains abandoned. People create folklore, like these ghost stories, to fill the gaps in knowledge. The legend also reinforces a collective identity of the town. The house is no longer just a house, but it is a piece of community and history. It connects people through emotions, whether that is fear or curiosity. This shows how folklore performs a social function in maintaining group identity. The interviewee associates this story with her town and the people she grew up with.

The different symbols and variations that the interviewee has claimed to hear can be considered allomotifs. If a specific part of the story has changed (e.g the instrument being a violin rather than a piano), that part would be considered an allomotif. The function of the story remains the same though, as the idea is that there is a haunted instrument that represents the haunting of the dead spirit.

“The Water Fountain Ghost”

Genre: Folk Narrative – Ghost Story

Text:

“At the summer camp I went to as a child, we were told a ghost story about a woman who roamed the grounds at night. The director of the camp sat down all the campers on the evening of the first day and told us that long ago, back in the earliest days of the camp, there was a camper who decided to leave their cabin in the middle of the night to explore. They decided to go to the water fountain by the pool, but because it was so dark outside, the camper couldn’t see where they were going and they tripped and fell into the water and drowned. The ghost of this camper, now a grown woman, is seen haunting the camp grounds at night, particularly in the area near the old water fountain. If she sees any campers wandering around outside where they are not allowed after dark, she will drag them into the pool so they can join her as a ghost.”

Context:

“I first heard this story when I was six or seven years old, and I was terrified! I totally believed it, and every night, I would look out my cabin window and look for the ghost lady. It took a few years for me to stop believing it, and it was really only when I had to go to the nurse’s office during the night and I was too scared to go because of the ghost, and the counselor told me that it wasn’t a true story and just something they told to scare the campers into staying inside the cabins. Later on, when the directors of the camp changed, they stopped telling the story which made me kind of sad, because I felt like it was part of the camp lore and kind of another rite of passage in growing up there as a camper.”

Analysis:

I agree with the informant’s realization that the story was something made up in order to scare the campers into staying inside their cabins during the night. In such a rural location, it would be likely that campers leaving their cabins during the night would get them hurt, either by their own actions or by a wild animal. It also discourages campers from engaging in misbehavior that wouldn’t be appropriate in a children’s camp setting, like meeting up with other campers during the night. I think, as the informant experienced, that this is probably a fairly successful method for the younger campers who believe the story, as scaring them into obedience probably has a higher success rate than telling them a seemingly arbitrary rule.

This ghost story reminded me of the story of La Llorona, who is a character from Mexican folklore who also takes the form of a wandering woman. La Llorona is found near bodies of water (just as this ghost is found near the water fountain/pool area) and is said to drown unfaithful men (while this ghost drowns disobedient children).