Kachi Kachi Yama Folktale

Language: English

Text Transcription

“The basic story is there’s this tanuki racoon that causes trouble for this old couple, and one day the tanuki gets caught by the old man in his fields, and he ties the raccoon up and hangs him upside down in his house.

Then, while the old man is gone one day and the wife is cooking, the raccoon begs the wife to set him free and that he’ll help her (which she does). In the version I read as a kid, he obviously tricks her and (maybe) hits her. I think the most that happens is that the wife lays on the ground injured, but in the original, she’s killed. Also in the original, the raccoon transforms into the wife, cooks the wife, and serves the old man a soup with his wife’s flesh

So in my kids version the old man gets angry because the tanuki hit his wife and fled, but in the original I guess it’s way more violent since she’s killed and fed to him.

And so the old man begs this other animal, the rabbit (who’s a good friend) to get revenge/avenge his wife, and the Wikipedia article just vaguely lists that the rabbit pretended to befriend the tanuki but tortured him like by dropping a bee’s nest on him, “treating” it with “medicine” that actually burned the injury. Then (and this is where the title comes from) while the tanuki is carrying a pile of sticks on his back, setting fire on that pile of sticks but brushing off the sound of the burning by saying they’re nearing “kachi kachi yama” which is why they can hear burning, until it’s too late and it burns him.

In the version I read as a kid, I think the burning incident happens first, and then the rabbit “treats” the burn with the “medicine,” so there’s no other torture that i can recall like the bee’s nest.

And then the last part of the story is that the rabbit and the tanuki have a boat race (I can’t remember the reason). In the original, the rabbit carved his boat out of a tree while the tanuki made a boat out of mud (which would dissolve).

In my version, I think the rabbit built both boats, and I can’t recall if one was wood and the other was mud, but I think the rabbit tricks the tanuki into being like “oh this boat is too heavy,” or maybe instead he calls one sturdier? Either way he hints at one being worse or better and the tanuki takes whichever is better, but then the boat starts to fall apart in the race.

In the original, in the end, the tanuki dies from drowning (and I think in some version the rabbit strikes him to ensure he drowns), but in my version, the rabbit makes him swear to stop his deeds and then pulls him out, and the ending instead is that the tanuki befriends the rabbit and the couple for real this time.”

Context

This is a Japanese folktale the informant heard growing up. As a child, she heard the watered-down version of the story, where the wife is not killed by the tanuki and in the end they all learn to coexist. Later on, she learned that the original story is much darker, ending in not one but two deaths.

It isn’t unsurprising to see a story censored for a younger audience. We’ve seen it in western fairy tales too: Cinderella’s stepsisters get to keep their feet intact in Disney’s take on the story. But I think it’s interesting to note how this watered down completely changes, even reverses, the moral of the story. In the children’s version, the moral is a lesson in forgiveness and learning your lesson. In the original, it’s more akin to “what goes around comes around.” The old man doesn’t forgive the tanuki for its role in his wife’s death, and enacts his vengeance through his friend the rabbit. The different versions of this story are two sides of the same coin, and in trying to curate the story for a younger audience, the original message is seemingly abandoned.

One thing the informant noted is that tanuki’s are generally well-meaning, playful tricksters in the stories that feature. This is the only story they know of where the tanuki plays a villainous role. In censoring the original tale, the tanuki in this story has inadvertently become more similar to its counterparts in other stories.

Bloody Mary Oikotype

Language: English

Text Transcription

“I went to a Catholic elementary school. The building was a mansion turned into a school, and there were always rumors of ghosts and such. In fourth grade, my classmates and I were bored and so we decided to practice divination by going to the bathroom mirror and doing the Bloody Mary ritual. We didn’t know who would show up, but we figured with the ghost rumors, surely someone would appear. No one ever did. We tried again and again throughout the year, and nothing happened. Our teacher was definitely upset [that] we would believe in such things and told us to pay more [attention] in Bible class. I don’t know about the others, but I, for one, didn’t.”

Context

As I talked to the informant, they revealed that the version of the ritual that they did was slightly different from the version older students were using. Rather than try to glimpse a vision of their future husband’s face, they were hoping to summon an evil version of Saint Mary. They explained that the inspiration came from their disinterest in the original ritual and their desire for a more horror-inspired version. Personally, I took note of a possible counter-cultural aspect, considering the desire to summon an evil variant of a saint might not go over well in a Catholic school. It seems that this oikotype of the Bloody Mary ritual carries a bit of a rebellious streak.

Spanish Ancestry and Family Heritage (Family Legend)

From My Informant:
 “A family story that has been passed down is the arrival of our Spanish ancestors to Mexico, many of whom were captains or individuals looking for a place to build a better future during the 1600s and 1700s.”

Context:
My informant first became deeply interested(not to say that they weren’t already) in their family history about two years ago, prompting discussions with multiple relatives including their grandmother, parents, aunts, and uncles. These conversations typically took place during family gatherings, celebrations, or holidays—occasions where stories naturally emerged. My informant described the storytelling experience as mixed; while some family members enthusiastically shared memories with vivid hand gestures and smiles, others were notably reluctant, withholding details and even disputing certain aspects of the family narrative.

The lack of visual documentation, such as photographs, due to limited access to early cameras, meant that the oral storytelling tradition became especially significant within my informant’s family. This storytelling environment revealed family tensions and differing attitudes towards their Spanish heritage, often highlighting discomfort with aspects of colonization and historical relations between Spain and Mexico.

Analysis:
My informant’s story underscores the complex interplay between personal identity, cultural heritage, and historical memory. The reluctance of some family members to share certain aspects of their past reflects broader cultural and historical anxieties about colonization and identity in the Hispanic world, particularly between Spain and Mexico. This family legend serves as both a repository of familial pride and an uncomfortable reminder of historical tensions associated with colonization.

Family narratives, such as the one with my informant, are vital in preserving cultural identity and transmitting intergenerational memory. They provide individuals with a sense of belonging, shaping their understanding of their heritage and personal identity. My informant’s effort to uncover this history indicates a desire for deeper personal connection and cultural awareness, despite potential familial resistance or discomfort.

Although my informant did not feel completely comfortable with sharing their family’s “baggage” with the outside world, they ultimately wanted their narrative to highlight the importance of preserving familial stories, regardless of their complexity or discomfort, as a means of fostering cultural pride and a deeper understanding of personal identity. This storytelling practice serves as a vital link, connecting past generations to future ones, enabling individuals to grasp their cultural and historical roots more fully.

John Henry and Labor Exploitation (Legend)

Informant’s Story:
 “John Henry was a steel driver who, in a legendary contest against a steam-powered rock drill, died victoriously with his hammer still in hand, his heart giving out from stress.”

Context:
My informant first encountered the story of John Henry at about age six during elementary school. They vividly recall a subsequent encounter around age eight, when an episode of “Transformers” mirrored the themes of John Henry’s legend. In this episode, a Transformer, superior to all others, eventually triumphed, but at the cost of losing its humanity. This resonated deeply with my informant, “I feel like my heart got ripped out.” For my informant, the robot became a powerful metaphor for John Henry, emphasizing the importance of choosing one’s battles(They were 8 and loved Transformers, you cannot judge them too much).

My informant critically observes that contemporary adaptations, notably Disney’s portrayal in animated films and theme park attractions like Splash Mountain, tend to simplify or romanticize the story. Such retellings, they argue, overlook the harsh realities and exploitation of labor that underpin the legend. My informant’s insights reveal a nuanced understanding of the legend as something more than a story of human triumph; rather, it is a stark reminder of labor struggles and the human cost behind industrial progress.

Analysis:
The legend of John Henry embodies significant historical and cultural anxieties surrounding labor, industrialization, and human endurance against mechanization. My informant’s interpretation, while acknowledging the heroism in John Henry’s resistance, emphasizes the tragic futility inherent in competing against relentless technological advancement. This perspective challenges the common narrative framing John Henry solely as a triumphant hero, instead highlighting the exploitation of labor and the inevitability of human limitations when pitted against industrial machinery.

Furthermore, the legend’s enduring popularity, despite its darker implications, reveals deeper cultural tensions regarding the value of human life and labor versus technological efficiency and progress. The “timelessness” of the story, as identified by my informant, derives from its persistent relevance to ongoing dialogues about labor rights, automation, and social justice. This legend thus serves as a powerful reminder that meaningful societal change requires collective action rather than individual sacrifice alone, reinforcing the essential lesson to “pick your battles” wisely in the face of unstoppable forces.

A Ghostly Encounter (Ghost Story)

Informant’s Story:
My informant shared a ghost story their dad has told since they were in kindergarten. “My dad was hired for a freelance construction job at a hotel, with compensation offered as an unlimited bar tab instead of cash. As he worked late into the night, a man who appeared to be part of the hotel staff served him drinks. Upon finishing the job, the worker thanked him, saying, ‘Thanks for helping my hotel.’ Later, when speaking with the hotel manager, my dad mentioned the drinks he’d received, only to learn that the hotel had no alcohol available that night. Confused, my dad pointed to a painting on the hotel wall, identifying the server. The manager, astonished, explained the painting depicted the hotel’s original owner, who had been deceased for over 40 years.”

Context:
This story was first introduced to my informant in kindergarten by their father, who regularly recounted it throughout their childhood. My informant vividly recalls the fascination and mystery surrounding this tale, noting the profound impact of hearing it from a trusted source like their father. This familial narrative holds special significance because it merges supernatural elements with personal and familial experience, creating a deep connection to the story that transcends mere entertainment.

Analysis:
At its core, this ghost story conveys powerful themes of reciprocity, karma, and moral responsibility. The informant strongly resonates with the lesson their father emphasized through the narrative: “If you take care of something, someone or something will take care of you.” The ghost’s gratitude and mysterious provision of drinks symbolizes the reciprocal nature of kindness, suggesting a deeper cosmic or moral balance at play. The informant interprets this as a powerful statement on karma: good intentions and actions inevitably result in positive outcomes.

Additionally, the informant highlighted a nuanced understanding of life’s interconnectivity, noting, “For every twenty dollars you find, someone has lost twenty dollars.” This insight demonstrates the story’s deeper exploration of life’s ethical and existential complexities. They also linked this lesson metaphorically to contemporary global issues such as climate change, further illustrating the story’s enduring relevance. Ultimately, the tale serves as a reflective medium, prompting listeners to consider deeper ethical responsibilities and interconnectedness in their everyday actions.